In 2019, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reported
that over 77 million individuals have diabetes in India, which
will increase to over 100 million by 2030 (IDF, 2019). Of these
people with diabetes, 25% will develop a diabetic foot ulcer
(DFU), equating to 5 million by 2030. Overall, half of ulcers
become infected during the healing process, necessitating
hospitalisation, while 20% of these patients require amputation.
DFUs contribute to approximately 80% of all non-traumatic
amputations performed annually in India (Ghosh and Valia,
2017). It is indicated that social epidemiology regarding DFU in
India differs from the West due to many factors including socio economic and cultural factors. This can lead to significant delay
in specialist referral, with patients still relying on treatment based
on local ethnic methods and not based on scientific data. This
results in patients presenting with highly infected ulcers (Rastogi
and Bhansali, 2016).
Infections in wound management are closely associated with
delayed healing, increased complications such as amputation,
and, moreover, have a negative impact on patients’ quality of life
(Cutting, 2016; Armstrong et al, 2017). Furthermore, due to the
complications that ensue, infections can increase the economic
burden on healthcare facilities related to wound management
and increase hospital stay (Nussbaum et al, 2018). The overall
management plan for people with DFUs (and for that matter any
chronic wound) should include six spheres: mechanical control
or pressure offloading, medical/metabolic control of the diabetes
and comorbidities, microbiological/infection management,
vascular control ensuring adequate blood flow, wound control
and education aimed at increasing patient awareness of foot care
over their lifetime.
Management of wound infection needs to include understanding
and involvement of the patient’s response and the local wound
healing environment, as well as a reduction of the microbial load
as part of the standard of care. This will include wound cleansing,
debridement, and appropriate use of topical antimicrobials
(International Wound Infection Institute, 2016).
The use of technology lipido-colloid with silver (TLC-Ag) is
supported by high-quality clinical evidence in the management of
wounds at risk or presenting with clinical signs of local infection;
TLC-Ag dressings show superior efficacy in reducing wound
bioburden, while also promoting wound healing. Additionally,
results demonstrate high tolerance and acceptability of TLC-Ag
dressings because of their atraumatic properties (Lazareth et al,
2007; 2008; Schäfer et al, 2008; Lazareth et al, 2012; Allaert,
2014). TLC-Ag dressings with cohesive poly-absorbent fibres
(UrgoClean Ag) have been developed to manage wounds with
higher levels of exudate and trap sloughy residues and can be
used throughout the stages of wound healing (Meaume et al,
2012; 2014; Dissemond al, 2020).
This document showcases the outcomes of UrgoClean Ag
in a real-world environment, demonstrating enhancement in
the management of DFU in India with improvement in wound
conditions and, furthermore, enhancing the patients’ quality
of life and clinicians’ satisfaction. Clinicians and organisations
worldwide need to understand that appropriate wound
management interventions based on high-level evidence should
be used to formulate local guidelines and DFU care pathways
Menu